Harford County Executive Bob Cassilly has publicly opposed a bill that could allow liquor stores and recreational cannabis dispensaries to operate in residential zones. The bill, introduced by County Council Member Aaron Penman, has sparked a heated debate over the potential impact on residential communities and local businesses.
The Bill: What It Proposes
Bill 24-037, introduced on November 12, aims to allow liquor stores and cannabis dispensaries to operate in B1 Zoning Districts. These areas, currently designated for residential neighborhoods, include community centers, daycare centers, libraries, and parks. Under the proposal, these businesses could be permitted to set up shop in 232 parcels of land across the county.
- Liquor Stores in Residential Areas: Cassilly voiced concerns that liquor stores in neighborhoods would bring increased traffic, including visitors from outside the local area.
- Cannabis Dispensaries: The bill would also open the door for cannabis dispensaries in areas already zoned for retail businesses, including specialty shops.
Cassilly’s opposition stems from fears that such businesses could disrupt the character of residential communities, as well as the county’s existing zoning laws.
Cassilly’s Concerns
In a letter sent to county councilmembers, Cassilly argued that the bill would cause unnecessary disruption in residential neighborhoods. He claimed that liquor stores and cannabis dispensaries would bring “more intensive use” to these areas and lead to an influx of traffic that would affect local residents. He also pointed to state law, which prohibits cannabis use from being treated more restrictively than liquor sales, suggesting that this could lead to cannabis shops being allowed in places where liquor stores are permitted.
- Signage Requirements: The bill includes regulations on signage, limiting it to one freestanding sign and requiring wall signs to match the color and material of the structure.
- Zoning Concerns: Cassilly emphasized that the bill could lead to a proliferation of liquor stores in areas that are already restricted by state law, which limits the number of liquor stores based on the population.
Response from Councilmember Penman
Councilmember Aaron Penman responded to Cassilly’s objections by accusing him of spreading misinformation. Penman argued that the bill does not allow cannabis dispensaries in B1 districts, as they are already permitted under existing zoning codes for specialty shops.
- Liquor Store Limits: Penman clarified that the bill does not permit an increase in liquor stores beyond what is already allowed under state law, which limits the number of liquor licenses to one for every 4,000 residents.
- Business Support: Penman stressed that the bill is intended to support local businesses, ensuring their success while also generating tax revenue that would benefit the county’s schools, infrastructure, and public safety.
Penman also noted that applications for liquor stores in residential areas would still require special exceptions and would be subject to review by the County Zoning Hearing Examiner to ensure they comply with zoning regulations and do not negatively impact public health or safety.
The Debate Continues
The Harford County Council held a public hearing on the bill on December 11, and a vote is expected on December 17. With strong opposing views from Cassilly and Penman, the outcome of this debate will have significant implications for the future of liquor stores and cannabis dispensaries in Harford County’s residential areas.
Maryland’s Cannabis Market
Recreational cannabis was legalized in Maryland in July 2023, and the state saw a surge in cannabis sales, totaling over $4.5 million on the first day. With the expansion of recreational cannabis sales, the state has also taken steps to address past injustices, including Governor Wes Moore’s decision to pardon more than 175,000 marijuana-related convictions in 2024.
As the debate over Bill 24-037 continues, Harford County residents and officials will have to weigh the potential economic benefits of expanded retail opportunities against the possible disruptions to residential neighborhoods. The final vote on the bill will determine how the county addresses the growing demand for cannabis and liquor retail in traditionally residential areas.
