The High Stakes of Substance Governance: Alcohol vs. Cannabis

public health analysis

In the realm of regulated substances, alcohol and cannabis stand as two giants with vastly different impacts on society. A recent analysis sheds light on the governance costs associated with each, revealing a stark contrast not only in financial terms but also in health and social repercussions.

Economic and Health Implications

The economic footprint of alcohol is enormous, with healthcare costs alone amounting to about $6.3 billion. In comparison, cannabis-related healthcare expenses are significantly lower, at $381 million. This discrepancy extends to productivity losses, where alcohol’s impact is over 16 times greater than that of cannabis.

public health analysis

Regulatory Disparities

The governance models for alcohol and cannabis vary greatly across provinces, with Alberta’s AGLC overseeing both substances. The financials are telling: alcohol net revenues are 14 times higher than cannabis, yet cannabis expenses are disproportionately high. This raises questions about the efficiency and fairness of the current regulatory frameworks.

Societal Costs

Beyond the balance sheets, the societal costs paint a sobering picture. Alcohol’s social cost stands at a staggering $2.38 billion, dwarfing the $491 million attributed to cannabis. These figures call for a critical evaluation of substance governance and its alignment with public welfare.

By Ethan Mitchell

Ethan Mitchell is the visionary founder of CBD Strains Only, a leading online platform dedicated to providing premium CBD products and information. With a passion for holistic wellness and a deep understanding of the benefits of CBD, Ethan's mission is to empower individuals to enhance their well-being through high-quality CBD strains.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts